![]() The conference committee accepted the House version "with the intent that it is not a necessary element of a prosecution that the defendant knew the actual age of the child." H.R.Rep. Hamilton, 456 F.2d 171, 172 (3d Cir.) (federal statute punishing transportation of a minor in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in immoral practices does not require knowledge of minor's age), cert. Expressly adopting this view, the House of Representatives struck "knowingly" from its bill. 21-22 (1977) (statement of Deputy Assistant Attorney General John C. ![]() Mandamus is an appropriate vehicle for settling the law in this case before trial and thereby avoiding uncertainty in this or any other prosecution under section 2251(a). 1983) (approving use of mandamus "as a one-time-only device to 'settle new and important problems' that might have otherwise evaded expeditious review") (quoting Schlagenhauf v. likely to confront a number of lower court judges in a number of suits before appellate review is possible.' " Armster, 806 F.2d at 1352 (quoting National Right to Work Legal Defense & Educ. may issue to clarify novel and important questions of law. In addition, the district court's order clearly raises a new and important issue of first impression.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |